Collaborator:
Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited 3-5-1 Nihonbashihoncho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
Kontakt
AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center Kontakt: Phone: 1-877-240-9479 E-Mail: information.center@astrazeneca.com» Kontaktdaten anzeigen
Studienlocations (3 von 36)
Research Site 13353 Berlin (Berlin) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 01370 Dresden (Sachsen) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 60488 Frankfurt (Hessen) Germany» Google-Maps
Research Site 37075 Göttingen (Niedersachsen) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 22763 Hamburg (Hamburg) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 50937 Köln (Nordrhein-Westfalen) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 4103 Leipzig (Sachsen) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 23538 Lübeck (Schleswig-Holstein) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 81377, DE Munchen (Bayern) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 89081 Ulm (Baden-Württemberg) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 97080 Wuerzburg (Bayern) Germany» Google-MapsResearch Site 4010 Linz Austria» Google-MapsResearch Site 5020 Salzburg Austria» Google-MapsResearch Site 2700 Wiener Neustadt Austria» Google-MapsResearch Site 1090 Wien Austria» Google-MapsResearch Site 1070 Anderlecht Belgium» Google-MapsResearch Site 2650 Edegem Belgium» Google-MapsResearch Site 3000 Leuven Belgium» Google-MapsResearch Site 4000 Liège Belgium» Google-MapsResearch Site 8800 Roeselare Belgium» Google-MapsResearch Site 90035-000 Porto Alegre Brazil» Google-MapsResearch Site 01246-000 Sao Paulo Brazil» Google-MapsResearch Site B3H 1V7 Halifax Canada» Google-MapsResearch Site M5G 2M9 Toronto Canada» Google-MapsResearch Site H3A 1A1 Montreal Canada» Google-MapsResearch Site 227-8577 Kashiwa Japan» Google-MapsResearch Site 135-8550 Koto-ku Japan» Google-MapsResearch Site 541-8567 Osaka-shi Japan» Google-MapsResearch Site 565-0871 Suita-city Japan» Google-MapsResearch Site 241-8515 Yokohama-shi Japan» Google-MapsResearch Site 03080 Seoul Korea, Republic of» Google-MapsResearch Site 3015 GD Rotterdam Netherlands» Google-MapsResearch Site 833 Kaohsiung Taiwan» Google-MapsResearch Site 10002 Taipei Taiwan» Google-MapsResearch Site 112 Taipei Taiwan» Google-MapsResearch Site 333 Taoyuan Taiwan» Google-Maps
1. Safety Run In: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig (Time Frame - Until all patients have completed at least 1 full Cycle (each cycle is 21 days)): Safety and tolerability will be evaluated with multiple endpoints including the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs, AESIs, and clinically significant change from baseline for Hematology, clinical chemistry, Urinalysis, vital sign including ECG will be summarized, specifically pts with QTcF prolongation greater than grade 3, number of pts with echocardiogram/MUGA results LVEF greater than 10 percentage points to below 50%.
2. Randomized Portion: To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care (SoC) in terms of Overall Survival in the HER2 IHC 3+ population (Time Frame - From date of treatment assignment until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months after first subject randomized)): Overall survival (OS) in HER2 IHC 3+ population OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
Secondary outcome:
1. To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the ITT population (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) (Time Frame - From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months after first subject randomized)): Overall Survival (OS) in ITT population (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) OS definition as above
2. To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the HER2 IHC 3+ population (Time Frame - From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months after first subject randomized)): Overall Survival (OS) in HER2 IHC 3+ population OS definition as above
3. To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the ITT population (Time Frame - From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months after first subject randomized)): Overall Survival (OS) in ITT population (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) OS definition as above
4. To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months)): Progression free survival (PFS) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
5. To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 48 months)): Progression free survival (PFS) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
6. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - Estimated up to 6 months since randomization): Objective response rate (ORR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, confirmed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression.
Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation.
The measure of interest is the odds ratio of ORR.
7. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - Estimated up to 6 months since randomization): Objective response rate (ORR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, confirmed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression.
Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation.
The measure of interest is the odds ratio of ORR.
8. To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 48 months)): Duration of response (DoR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the median DoR.
9. To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the IHC 3+ and ITT populations (Time Frame - From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 48 months)): Duration of response (DoR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the median DoR.
10. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Overall survival in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. (Time Frame - From the date of randomisation until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 48 months)): Overall survival (OS) in HER2 IHC 3+ population OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
11. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of PFS in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. (Time Frame - From the date of randomisation until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 48 months)): Progression free survival (PFS) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
12. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Duration of response in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. (Time Frame - From the date of first response until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 48 months)): Duration of response (DoR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression.
The measure of interest is the median DoR.
13. To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Objective response rate in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations. (Time Frame - Estimated up to 6 months): Objective response rate (ORR) in HER2 IHC 3+ and ITT populations ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, confirmed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression.
Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation.
The measure of interest is the odds ratio of ORR.
14. To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care (Time Frame - From first dose of study intervention until 90 days after the last dose except for ILD/pneumonitis, where safety follow-up will be continued until resolution.): Safety and tolerability will be evaluated with multiple endpoints including the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs, AESIs, and clinically significant change from baseline for Hematology, clinical chemistry, Urinalysis, vital sign including ECG will be summarized, specifically pts with QTcF prolongation greater than grade 3, number of pts with echocardiogram/MUGA results LVEF greater than 10 percentage points to below 50%.
15. To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care (Time Frame - From first dose of study intervention until 90 days after the last dose except for ILD/pneumonitis, where safety follow-up will be continued until resolution.): Safety and tolerability will be evaluated with multiple endpoints including the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs, AESIs, and clinically significant change from baseline for Hematology, clinical chemistry, Urinalysis, vital sign including ECG will be summarized, specifically pts with QTcF prolongation greater than grade 3, number of pts with echocardiogram/MUGA results LVEF greater than 10 percentage points to below 50%.
16. To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on a summary of symptomatic AEs (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322).
17. To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on a summary of symptomatic AEs (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322)
18. To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to T-DXd monotherapy based on a summary of symptomatic AEs and overall side-effect bother (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Symptomatic AEs and overall side-effect bother definitions as above
19. To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration.
Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold.
- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
20. To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of care (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration.
Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold.
- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
21. To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs T-DXd monotherapy (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration.
Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold.
- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
22. To assess the pharmacokinetics of T-DXd, total anti- HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in serum (Time Frame - From the time of informed consent until 30 and 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig, respectively): Descriptive analysis of serum concentration of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
23. To investigate the immunogenicity of T-DXd and of rilvegostomig (Time Frame - From the time of informed consent until 30 and 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig, respectively): Descriptive summary of presence of ADAs for T-DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
24. To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on overall side-effect bother (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be mesured using PGI-TT
25. To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on overall side-effect bother (Time Frame - Until End of Study (estimated up to 48 months)): Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be assessed will be mesured using PGI-TT
Gemcitabine: Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Cisplatin: Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Durvalumab: Standard of care immunotherapy by intravenous infusion
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a; T-DXd): Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Rilvegostomig: Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Agilent HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx: A semi-quantitative immunohistochemical assay to determine HER2 overexpression in FFPE breast cancer tissues routinely processed for histological evaluation.
Based on a primary monoclonal rabbit antibody which visualises Her2 overexpression utilising a fully automated IHC platform (Dako Omnis).
Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assay: A qualitative immunohistochemical assay to determine the level of PD-L1 expression in FFPE non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues routinely processed for histological evaluation. Based on a rabbit monoclonal anti-PD-L1 clone SP263 which visualises PD-L1 protein using a VENTANA BenchMark ULTRA instrument
Quelle: ClinicalTrials.gov
Sie können folgenden Inhalt einem Kollegen empfehlen:
"Phase 3 Study of T-DXd and Rilvegostomig Versus SoC in Advanced HER2-expressing Biliary Tract Cancer"
Bitte tragen Sie auch die Absenderdaten vollständig ein, damit Sie der Empfänger erkennen kann.
Die mit (*) gekennzeichneten Angaben müssen eingetragen werden!